Algeria vs New Zealand: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Algeria
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 10,292 t against 8,211 t in Algeria, a difference of 2,081 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Algeria's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 30th and New Zealand ranks 27th of 161 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22,763 t | 9,743 t | 13,020 t | Algeria |
| 2010s | 17,047 t | 15,758 t | 1,289 t | Algeria |
| 2020s | 3,912 t | 6,031 t | 2,119 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Algeria or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 10,292 t against 8,211 t in Algeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Algeria and New Zealand?
- 2,081 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and New Zealand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and New Zealand rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Algeria ranks 30th and New Zealand ranks 27th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf