Angola vs Solomon Islands: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Angola
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Angola currently reports 500.45 t against 313.23 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 187.22 t.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.6 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 68th and Solomon Islands ranks 71st of 163 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.95 t | 5.04 t | 11.91 t | Angola |
| 2010s | 862.16 t | 205.6 t | 656.57 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Angola or Solomon Islands?
- Angola, at 500.45 t against 313.23 t in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Angola and Solomon Islands?
- 187.22 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Solomon Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Angola and Solomon Islands rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Angola ranks 68th and Solomon Islands ranks 71st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf