Armenia vs Burkina Faso: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Armenia
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 2 t against 1.2 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.8 t.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.7 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Armenia ranks 133rd and Burkina Faso ranks 135th of 161 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Burkina Faso in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.84 t | 134.82 t | 128.98 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 751.88 t | 122.75 t | 629.13 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 6.07 t | 1.2 t | 4.87 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Armenia or Burkina Faso?
- Armenia, at 2 t against 1.2 t in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Armenia and Burkina Faso?
- 0.8 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Burkina Faso?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Burkina Faso rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Armenia ranks 133rd and Burkina Faso ranks 135th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf