Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Bahamas
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 4 t against 2.74 t in Bahamas, a difference of 1.26 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.5 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Bahamas ranks 130th and Costa Rica ranks 128th of 161 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.85 t | 196.82 t | 188.97 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 5.7 t | 371.83 t | 366.13 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 5.01 t | 124.08 t | 119.07 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Bahamas or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 4 t against 2.74 t in Bahamas as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Bahamas and Costa Rica?
- 1.26 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Costa Rica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Costa Rica rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Bahamas ranks 130th and Costa Rica ranks 128th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf