Costa Rica vs Iceland: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Costa Rica
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 4.55 t against 4 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.55 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 138th and Iceland ranks 137th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 150 t | 19.25 t | 130.75 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 700 t | 2.32 t | 697.68 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.78 t | 4.55 t | 3.77 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Costa Rica or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 4.55 t against 4 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Costa Rica and Iceland?
- 0.55 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Iceland rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Costa Rica ranks 138th and Iceland ranks 137th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf