Ecuador vs Ethiopia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 50.56 t against 25 t in Ecuador, a difference of 25.56 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 2.0 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 118th and Ethiopia ranks 115th of 173 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,129 t | 9.47 t | 4,120 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 436.4 t | 98.57 t | 337.83 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 185 t | 50.56 t | 134.44 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Ecuador or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 50.56 t against 25 t in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Ecuador and Ethiopia?
- 25.56 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Ethiopia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Ethiopia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 118th and Ethiopia ranks 115th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf