Eswatini vs Montenegro: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Montenegro
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.2 t against 0.06 t in Montenegro, a difference of 0.14 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 3.3 times Montenegro's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 161st and Montenegro ranks 164th of 173 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 345.47 t | 50.59 t | 294.88 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 79.2 t | 73.03 t | 6.17 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.2 t | 0.06 t | 0.14 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Eswatini or Montenegro?
- Eswatini, at 0.2 t against 0.06 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Eswatini and Montenegro?
- 0.14 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Montenegro rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 161st and Montenegro ranks 164th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf