Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.3 t against 0.2 t in Eswatini, a difference of 0.1 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Eswatini ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 173 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 660.97 t | 1,127 t | 465.59 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 79.2 t | 2,848 t | 2,769 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.3 t against 0.2 t in Eswatini as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf