Guatemala vs Luxembourg: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Guatemala
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 106.53 t against 97.94 t in Guatemala, a difference of 8.59 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 104th and Luxembourg ranks 101st of 173 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,567 t | 1,212 t | 354.84 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 865.73 t | 176.64 t | 689.08 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 155.79 t | 141.48 t | 14.31 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Guatemala or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 106.53 t against 97.94 t in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Guatemala and Luxembourg?
- 8.59 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Luxembourg?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Luxembourg rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Guatemala ranks 104th and Luxembourg ranks 101st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf