Kazakhstan vs New Caledonia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Kazakhstan
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 12.39 t against 8.02 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 4.37 t.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.5 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 133rd and New Caledonia ranks 130th of 173 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,939 t | 79.67 t | 1,859 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 427.48 t | 19.49 t | 407.99 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Kazakhstan or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 12.39 t against 8.02 t in Kazakhstan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Kazakhstan and New Caledonia?
- 4.37 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Caledonia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2015.
- How do Kazakhstan and New Caledonia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Kazakhstan ranks 133rd and New Caledonia ranks 130th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf