Kuwait vs Solomon Islands: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Kuwait
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 313.23 t against 297.66 t in Kuwait, a difference of 15.57 t.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 80th and Solomon Islands ranks 78th of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 329.87 t | 1.01 t | 328.86 t | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 108.11 t | 228.11 t | 120 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Kuwait or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 313.23 t against 297.66 t in Kuwait as of 2018.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Kuwait and Solomon Islands?
- 15.57 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Solomon Islands?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Kuwait and Solomon Islands rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Kuwait ranks 80th and Solomon Islands ranks 78th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf