Kyrgyzstan vs Yemen: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Yemen
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 154.71 t against 122.19 t in Yemen, a difference of 32.52 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Yemen ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 89th and Yemen ranks 92nd of 161 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 663.03 t | 176.67 t | 486.37 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 6,207 t | 838.75 t | 5,368 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 82.59 t | 191.09 t | 108.5 t | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Kyrgyzstan or Yemen?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 154.71 t against 122.19 t in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Kyrgyzstan and Yemen?
- 32.52 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Yemen?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Yemen rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 89th and Yemen ranks 92nd of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf