Luxembourg vs Nigeria: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- Nigeria
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 106.53 t against 100.32 t in Nigeria, a difference of 6.21 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Nigeria ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 101st and Nigeria ranks 102nd of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 562.88 t | 25,951 t | 25,389 t | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 193.54 t | 6,306 t | 6,112 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 249.76 t | 100.32 t | 149.44 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Luxembourg or Nigeria?
- Luxembourg, at 106.53 t against 100.32 t in Nigeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Luxembourg and Nigeria?
- 6.21 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Nigeria?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Nigeria rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 101st and Nigeria ranks 102nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf