Luxembourg vs Yemen: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 122.19 t against 106.53 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 15.66 t.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 101st and Yemen ranks 99th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 500.32 t | 301.27 t | 199.05 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 108.85 t | 552.39 t | 443.54 t | Yemen |
| 2020s | 149.54 t | 191.09 t | 41.56 t | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Luxembourg or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 122.19 t against 106.53 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Luxembourg and Yemen?
- 15.66 t, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Yemen?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Yemen rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 101st and Yemen ranks 99th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf