Mozambique vs Uzbekistan: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Mozambique
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 17 t against 8.86 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 8.14 t.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.9 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 129th and Uzbekistan ranks 132nd of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.91 t | 7.33 t | 35.58 t | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 5 t | 1,252 t | 1,247 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 17 t | 8.86 t | 8.14 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Mozambique or Uzbekistan?
- Mozambique, at 17 t against 8.86 t in Uzbekistan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Mozambique and Uzbekistan?
- 8.14 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Uzbekistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Mozambique and Uzbekistan rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Mozambique ranks 129th and Uzbekistan ranks 132nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf