Pakistan vs Switzerland: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Pakistan
- Switzerland
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 3,561 t against 2,175 t in Switzerland, a difference of 1,386 t.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.6 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 47th and Switzerland ranks 49th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25,086 t | 6,922 t | 18,164 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 4,924 t | 5,510 t | 585.54 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 2,495 t | 1,501 t | 993.25 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Pakistan or Switzerland?
- Pakistan, at 3,561 t against 2,175 t in Switzerland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Pakistan and Switzerland?
- 1,386 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Switzerland?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Switzerland rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Pakistan ranks 47th and Switzerland ranks 49th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf