Afghanistan vs Finland: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Afghanistan
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 50.79 1000 USD against 43.8 1000 USD in Afghanistan, a difference of 6.99 1000 USD.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Finland ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 103rd and Finland ranks 101st of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 367.47 1000 USD | 351.82 1000 USD | 15.65 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 43.8 1000 USD | 84.06 1000 USD | 40.26 1000 USD | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Afghanistan or Finland?
- Finland, at 50.79 1000 USD against 43.8 1000 USD in Afghanistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Afghanistan and Finland?
- 6.99 1000 USD, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Finland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Afghanistan and Finland rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Afghanistan ranks 103rd and Finland ranks 101st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf