Albania vs Luxembourg: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Albania
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Albania currently reports 32.96 1000 USD against 31.62 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.34 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 111th and Luxembourg ranks 112th of 173 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,570 1000 USD | 148.35 1000 USD | 1,422 1000 USD | Albania |
| 2010s | 2,400 1000 USD | 82.65 1000 USD | 2,317 1000 USD | Albania |
| 2020s | 32.96 1000 USD | 15.45 1000 USD | 17.51 1000 USD | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Albania or Luxembourg?
- Albania, at 32.96 1000 USD against 31.62 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2020.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Albania and Luxembourg?
- 1.34 1000 USD, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Luxembourg?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Albania and Luxembourg rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Albania ranks 111th and Luxembourg ranks 112th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf