Algeria vs Canada: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Algeria
- Canada
How they compare
Canada currently reports 5,841 1000 USD against 4,273 1000 USD in Algeria, a difference of 1,568 1000 USD.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.4 times Algeria's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 33rd and Canada ranks 30th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Canada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,269 1000 USD | 541.27 1000 USD | 3,728 1000 USD | Algeria |
| 2010s | 7,403 1000 USD | 1,792 1000 USD | 5,611 1000 USD | Algeria |
| 2020s | 2,929 1000 USD | 2,940 1000 USD | 10.82 1000 USD | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Algeria or Canada?
- Canada, at 5,841 1000 USD against 4,273 1000 USD in Algeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Algeria and Canada?
- 1,568 1000 USD, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Canada?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and Canada rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Algeria ranks 33rd and Canada ranks 30th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf