Algeria vs New Zealand: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Algeria
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 4,468 1000 USD against 4,273 1000 USD in Algeria, a difference of 195 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 30th and New Zealand ranks 29th of 161 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,269 1000 USD | 2,085 1000 USD | 2,184 1000 USD | Algeria |
| 2010s | 7,403 1000 USD | 4,637 1000 USD | 2,766 1000 USD | Algeria |
| 2020s | 2,929 1000 USD | 2,808 1000 USD | 120.95 1000 USD | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Algeria or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 4,468 1000 USD against 4,273 1000 USD in Algeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Algeria and New Zealand?
- 195 1000 USD, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and New Zealand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and New Zealand rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Algeria ranks 30th and New Zealand ranks 29th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf