Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Serbia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
17,638 1000 USD
in 2024
Serbia
19,460 1000 USD
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) rank
13th
Serbia rank
12th

Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time

  • Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
  • Serbia
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k200220132024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 19,460 1000 USD against 17,638 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 1,822 1000 USD.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ahead.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 12th of 163 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 55,393 1000 USD 776.15 1000 USD 54,617 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
2010s 45,311 1000 USD 74.66 1000 USD 45,236 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
2020s 4,721 1000 USD 19,460 1000 USD 14,739 1000 USD Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) or Serbia?
Serbia, at 19,460 1000 USD against 17,638 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) as of 2023.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Serbia?
1,822 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Serbia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Serbia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 12th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Serbia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/serbia/">Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Serbia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 3,463 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf