Australia vs Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade): Superphosphates above 35% — Import value

Australia
12,033 1000 USD
in 2024
Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade)
23,199 1000 USD
in 2024
Australia rank
21st
Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade) rank
21st

Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time

  • Australia
  • Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade)
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k200220132024

How they compare

Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade) currently reports 23,199 1000 USD against 12,033 1000 USD in Australia, a difference of 11,166 1000 USD.

That makes Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade)'s figure about 1.9 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 21st and Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade) ranks 21st of 163 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade) Difference Ahead
2000s 46,959 1000 USD 3,837 1000 USD 43,123 1000 USD Australia
2010s 36,287 1000 USD 7,875 1000 USD 28,413 1000 USD Australia
2020s 6,599 1000 USD 25,926 1000 USD 19,327 1000 USD Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Australia or Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade)?
Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade), at 23,199 1000 USD against 12,033 1000 USD in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Australia and Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade)?
11,166 1000 USD, with Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade)?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Australia and Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade) rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
Australia ranks 21st and Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade) ranks 21st of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade): Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/australia/eastern-africa-excluding-intra-trade/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/australia/eastern-africa-excluding-intra-trade/">Australia vs Eastern Africa (excluding intra-trade): Superphosphates above 35% — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 3,463 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf