Australia vs Romania: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Australia
- Romania
How they compare
Australia currently reports 12,033 1000 USD against 11,751 1000 USD in Romania, a difference of 282 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 24th and Romania ranks 25th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46,959 1000 USD | 2,475 1000 USD | 44,484 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 36,287 1000 USD | 8,884 1000 USD | 27,404 1000 USD | Australia |
| 2020s | 6,599 1000 USD | 12,901 1000 USD | 6,302 1000 USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Australia or Romania?
- Australia, at 12,033 1000 USD against 11,751 1000 USD in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Australia and Romania?
- 282 1000 USD, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Romania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Romania rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Australia ranks 24th and Romania ranks 25th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf