Austria vs Czechia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Austria
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 3,830 1000 USD against 3,634 1000 USD in Austria, a difference of 196 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 37th and Czechia ranks 35th of 173 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,085 1000 USD | 3,020 1000 USD | 934.37 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 3,283 1000 USD | 6,188 1000 USD | 2,906 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 4,026 1000 USD | 6,611 1000 USD | 2,585 1000 USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Austria or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 3,830 1000 USD against 3,634 1000 USD in Austria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Austria and Czechia?
- 196 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Czechia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Czechia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Austria ranks 37th and Czechia ranks 35th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf