Azerbaijan vs Ethiopia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Azerbaijan
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 1.85 1000 USD against 1.14 1000 USD in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.71 1000 USD.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.6 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 149th and Ethiopia ranks 146th of 173 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,586 1000 USD | 9.42 1000 USD | 4,577 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 1,064 1000 USD | 47.86 1000 USD | 1,016 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Azerbaijan or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 1.85 1000 USD against 1.14 1000 USD in Azerbaijan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Azerbaijan and Ethiopia?
- 0.71 1000 USD, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Ethiopia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
- How do Azerbaijan and Ethiopia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Azerbaijan ranks 149th and Ethiopia ranks 146th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf