Bahamas vs Ethiopia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Bahamas
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 1.85 1000 USD against 1.3 1000 USD in Bahamas, a difference of 0.55 1000 USD.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.4 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Bahamas ranks 148th and Ethiopia ranks 146th of 173 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.94 1000 USD | 7.65 1000 USD | 4.71 1000 USD | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 4.47 1000 USD | 81.75 1000 USD | 77.27 1000 USD | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 1.33 1000 USD | 1.85 1000 USD | 0.52 1000 USD | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Bahamas or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 1.85 1000 USD against 1.3 1000 USD in Bahamas as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Bahamas and Ethiopia?
- 0.55 1000 USD, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Ethiopia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Bahamas and Ethiopia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Bahamas ranks 148th and Ethiopia ranks 146th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf