Belarus vs Ecuador: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 21.42 1000 USD against 12.5 1000 USD in Belarus, a difference of 8.92 1000 USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.7 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Belarus ranks 114th and Ecuador ranks 111th of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 560.71 1000 USD | 1,313 1000 USD | 751.81 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 6,508 1000 USD | 267.15 1000 USD | 6,241 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 21.42 1000 USD against 12.5 1000 USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 8.92 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Belarus ranks 114th and Ecuador ranks 111th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf