Belgium vs Italy: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Belgium
- Italy
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 16,139 1000 USD against 13,403 1000 USD in Italy, a difference of 2,736 1000 USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Italy ahead.
Belgium ranks 18th and Italy ranks 21st of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28,118 1000 USD | 24,701 1000 USD | 3,417 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 14,371 1000 USD | 19,164 1000 USD | 4,793 1000 USD | Italy |
| 2020s | 13,568 1000 USD | 10,248 1000 USD | 3,320 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Belgium or Italy?
- Belgium, at 16,139 1000 USD against 13,403 1000 USD in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Belgium and Italy?
- 2,736 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Italy?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Italy rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Belgium ranks 18th and Italy ranks 21st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf