Belgium vs Poland: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Belgium
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 17,206 1000 USD against 16,139 1000 USD in Belgium, a difference of 1,067 1000 USD.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 18th and Poland ranks 15th of 173 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24,107 1000 USD | 120.18 1000 USD | 23,987 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 14,766 1000 USD | 1,436 1000 USD | 13,330 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 13,568 1000 USD | 12,487 1000 USD | 1,081 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Belgium or Poland?
- Poland, at 17,206 1000 USD against 16,139 1000 USD in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Belgium and Poland?
- 1,067 1000 USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Poland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Poland rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Belgium ranks 18th and Poland ranks 15th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf