Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
707.79 1000 USD
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo
247.75 1000 USD
in 2020
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
3rd
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
6th

Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0200400600800200320132024

How they compare

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) currently reports 707.79 1000 USD against 247.75 1000 USD in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 460.04 1000 USD.

That makes Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s figure about 2.9 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 3rd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th of 10 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 1 and Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 249.28 1000 USD 144.55 1000 USD 104.73 1000 USD Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2010s 248.8 1000 USD 262.94 1000 USD 14.14 1000 USD Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of), at 707.79 1000 USD against 247.75 1000 USD in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
460.04 1000 USD, with Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 3rd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th of 10 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 3,463 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf