Bulgaria vs Costa Rica: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Bulgaria
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 42.19 1000 USD against 40.76 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.43 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 97th and Costa Rica ranks 98th of 161 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.81 1000 USD | 44.67 1000 USD | 41.85 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 1,467 1000 USD | 224.65 1000 USD | 1,242 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 2,129 1000 USD | 79.2 1000 USD | 2,049 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Bulgaria or Costa Rica?
- Bulgaria, at 42.19 1000 USD against 40.76 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Bulgaria and Costa Rica?
- 1.43 1000 USD, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Costa Rica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Costa Rica rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Bulgaria ranks 97th and Costa Rica ranks 98th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf