Burundi vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value

Burundi
60,575 1000 USD
in 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
31,720 1000 USD
in 2024
Burundi rank
6th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
8th

Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time

  • Burundi
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k200220132024

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 60,575 1000 USD against 31,720 1000 USD in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 28,855 1000 USD.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.9 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Burundi ranks 6th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 8th of 163 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 210.08 1000 USD 54,196 1000 USD 53,986 1000 USD United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 1,470 1000 USD 63,344 1000 USD 61,874 1000 USD United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 49,604 1000 USD 33,938 1000 USD 15,667 1000 USD Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Burundi or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Burundi, at 60,575 1000 USD against 31,720 1000 USD in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Burundi and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
28,855 1000 USD, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Burundi and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
Burundi ranks 6th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 8th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/burundi/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/burundi/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Burundi vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 3,463 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf