Cambodia vs Congo: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Cambodia
- Congo
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 445.65 1000 USD against 357.25 1000 USD in Congo, a difference of 88.4 1000 USD.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Congo ahead.
Cambodia ranks 55th and Congo ranks 58th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.56 1000 USD | 172.41 1000 USD | 88.84 1000 USD | Congo |
| 2010s | 1,429 1000 USD | 34.02 1000 USD | 1,395 1000 USD | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 258.84 1000 USD | 189.16 1000 USD | 69.68 1000 USD | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Cambodia or Congo?
- Cambodia, at 445.65 1000 USD against 357.25 1000 USD in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Cambodia and Congo?
- 88.4 1000 USD, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Congo?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Congo rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Cambodia ranks 55th and Congo ranks 58th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf