Cambodia vs Georgia: Superphosphates above 35% β Import value
Superphosphates above 35% β Import value over time
- Cambodia
- Georgia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 445.65 1000 USD against 357.89 1000 USD in Georgia, a difference of 87.76 1000 USD.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Georgia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 59th and Georgia ranks 62nd of 173 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.56 1000 USD | 67.08 1000 USD | 16.49 1000 USD | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 1,882 1000 USD | 198.83 1000 USD | 1,684 1000 USD | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% β import value, Cambodia or Georgia?
- Cambodia, at 445.65 1000 USD against 357.89 1000 USD in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% β import value between Cambodia and Georgia?
- 87.76 1000 USD, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Georgia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and Georgia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% β import value?
- Cambodia ranks 59th and Georgia ranks 62nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% β Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf