Cambodia vs Oman: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Cambodia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 489.44 1000 USD against 445.65 1000 USD in Cambodia, a difference of 43.79 1000 USD.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Oman ahead.
Cambodia ranks 59th and Oman ranks 57th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.38 1000 USD | 391.49 1000 USD | 335.11 1000 USD | Oman |
| 2010s | 1,112 1000 USD | 459.08 1000 USD | 653.24 1000 USD | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 258.84 1000 USD | 545.36 1000 USD | 286.52 1000 USD | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Cambodia or Oman?
- Oman, at 489.44 1000 USD against 445.65 1000 USD in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Cambodia and Oman?
- 43.79 1000 USD, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Oman?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Oman rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Cambodia ranks 59th and Oman ranks 57th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf