Cambodia vs Viet Nam: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Cambodia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 445.65 1000 USD against 444.69 1000 USD in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.96 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Cambodia ranks 59th and Viet Nam ranks 60th of 173 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.38 1000 USD | 885.19 1000 USD | 828.81 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 1,101 1000 USD | 1,175 1000 USD | 73.91 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 72.03 1000 USD | 106.86 1000 USD | 34.83 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Cambodia or Viet Nam?
- Cambodia, at 445.65 1000 USD against 444.69 1000 USD in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Cambodia and Viet Nam?
- 0.96 1000 USD, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Viet Nam?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Cambodia and Viet Nam rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Cambodia ranks 59th and Viet Nam ranks 60th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf