Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) vs New Zealand: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value

Central Asia (excluding intra-trade)
0.02 1000 USD
in 2024
New Zealand
4,468 1000 USD
in 2024
Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) rank
31st
New Zealand rank
29th

Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time

  • Central Asia (excluding intra-trade)
  • New Zealand
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200220132024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 4,468 1000 USD against 0.02 1000 USD in Central Asia (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 4,468 1000 USD.

Across all 23 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 29th of 31 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 128.59 1000 USD 3,015 1000 USD 2,886 1000 USD New Zealand
2010s 93.54 1000 USD 4,488 1000 USD 4,394 1000 USD New Zealand
2020s 8.33 1000 USD 2,795 1000 USD 2,787 1000 USD New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 4,468 1000 USD against 0.02 1000 USD in Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) and New Zealand?
4,468 1000 USD, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) and New Zealand?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) and New Zealand rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) ranks 31st and New Zealand ranks 29th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) vs New Zealand: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/central-asia-excluding-intra-trade/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/central-asia-excluding-intra-trade/new-zealand/">Central Asia (excluding intra-trade) vs New Zealand: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 3,463 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf