Chile vs Paraguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Chile
- Paraguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 29,528 1000 USD against 22,731 1000 USD in Paraguay, a difference of 6,797 1000 USD.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 10th and Paraguay ranks 11th of 173 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44,658 1000 USD | 13,055 1000 USD | 31,603 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 45,603 1000 USD | 31,693 1000 USD | 13,910 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2020s | 37,144 1000 USD | 15,438 1000 USD | 21,706 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Chile or Paraguay?
- Chile, at 29,528 1000 USD against 22,731 1000 USD in Paraguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Chile and Paraguay?
- 6,797 1000 USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Paraguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Paraguay rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Chile ranks 10th and Paraguay ranks 11th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf