China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value

China, Hong Kong SAR
6.52 1000 USD
in 2014
Zimbabwe
5.85 1000 USD
in 2022
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
124th
Zimbabwe rank
126th

Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k200220122022

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 6.52 1000 USD against 5.85 1000 USD in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.67 1000 USD.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 163 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 63.64 1000 USD 242.97 1000 USD 179.33 1000 USD Zimbabwe
2010s 24.55 1000 USD 1,438 1000 USD 1,413 1000 USD Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, China, Hong Kong SAR or Zimbabwe?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 6.52 1000 USD against 5.85 1000 USD in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
0.67 1000 USD, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/china-hong-kong-sar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/china-hong-kong-sar/zimbabwe/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 3,463 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf