Congo vs Fiji: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Congo
- Fiji
How they compare
Congo currently reports 357.25 1000 USD against 328.97 1000 USD in Fiji, a difference of 28.28 1000 USD.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 63rd and Fiji ranks 65th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 330.68 1000 USD | 3.48 1000 USD | 327.2 1000 USD | Congo |
| 2010s | 29.21 1000 USD | 202.75 1000 USD | 173.53 1000 USD | Fiji |
| 2020s | 357.25 1000 USD | 328.97 1000 USD | 28.28 1000 USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Congo or Fiji?
- Congo, at 357.25 1000 USD against 328.97 1000 USD in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Congo and Fiji?
- 28.28 1000 USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Fiji?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Fiji rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Congo ranks 63rd and Fiji ranks 65th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf