Cook Islands vs Zimbabwe: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Cook Islands
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 5.85 1000 USD against 5.41 1000 USD in Cook Islands, a difference of 0.44 1000 USD.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Cook Islands's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Cook Islands ranks 137th and Zimbabwe ranks 136th of 173 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.48 1000 USD | 518.29 1000 USD | 516.8 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 4.26 1000 USD | 2,719 1000 USD | 2,715 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Cook Islands or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 5.85 1000 USD against 5.41 1000 USD in Cook Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Cook Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 0.44 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
- How do Cook Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Cook Islands ranks 137th and Zimbabwe ranks 136th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf