Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Costa Rica
- Tunisia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 40.76 1000 USD against 38.48 1000 USD in Tunisia, a difference of 2.28 1000 USD.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 98th and Tunisia ranks 100th of 161 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.45 1000 USD | 432.63 1000 USD | 381.18 1000 USD | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 270.75 1000 USD | 0.8033 1000 USD | 269.94 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Costa Rica or Tunisia?
- Costa Rica, at 40.76 1000 USD against 38.48 1000 USD in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Costa Rica and Tunisia?
- 2.28 1000 USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do Costa Rica and Tunisia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Costa Rica ranks 98th and Tunisia ranks 100th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf