Croatia vs Tajikistan: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Croatia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 957.07 1000 USD against 858.63 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 98.44 1000 USD.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Croatia ranks 51st and Tajikistan ranks 48th of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 155.47 1000 USD | 1,375 1000 USD | 1,220 1000 USD | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 2,255 1000 USD | 688.93 1000 USD | 1,566 1000 USD | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Croatia or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 957.07 1000 USD against 858.63 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Croatia and Tajikistan?
- 98.44 1000 USD, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Tajikistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Croatia and Tajikistan rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Croatia ranks 51st and Tajikistan ranks 48th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf