Cuba vs Suriname: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Cuba
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 198.2 1000 USD against 161.08 1000 USD in Cuba, a difference of 37.12 1000 USD.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 79th and Suriname ranks 76th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,644 1000 USD | 53.24 1000 USD | 3,590 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 10,597 1000 USD | 107.61 1000 USD | 10,489 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2020s | 161.08 1000 USD | 407.45 1000 USD | 246.37 1000 USD | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Cuba or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 198.2 1000 USD against 161.08 1000 USD in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Cuba and Suriname?
- 37.12 1000 USD, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Suriname?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Suriname rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Cuba ranks 79th and Suriname ranks 76th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf