Czechia vs Ireland: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Czechia
- Ireland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 3,830 1000 USD against 3,572 1000 USD in Ireland, a difference of 258 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ireland ahead.
Czechia ranks 35th and Ireland ranks 38th of 173 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,020 1000 USD | 1,950 1000 USD | 1,070 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 6,573 1000 USD | 3,778 1000 USD | 2,795 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 6,611 1000 USD | 4,140 1000 USD | 2,471 1000 USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Czechia or Ireland?
- Czechia, at 3,830 1000 USD against 3,572 1000 USD in Ireland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Czechia and Ireland?
- 258 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Ireland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Ireland rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Czechia ranks 35th and Ireland ranks 38th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf