Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
25.23 1000 USD
in 2016
Democratic Republic of the Congo
247.75 1000 USD
in 2020
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
9th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
6th

Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0200400600200220112020

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 247.75 1000 USD against 25.23 1000 USD in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 222.52 1000 USD.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 9.8 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 9th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th of 10 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 32.39 1000 USD 155.61 1000 USD 123.22 1000 USD Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 43.21 1000 USD 286.05 1000 USD 242.84 1000 USD Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 247.75 1000 USD against 25.23 1000 USD in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2020.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
222.52 1000 USD, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2016.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 9th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th of 10 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-import-value/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 3,463 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf