Ecuador vs Maldives: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Ecuador
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 24.66 1000 USD against 21.42 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 3.24 1000 USD.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 120th and Maldives ranks 118th of 173 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,313 1000 USD | 3.71 1000 USD | 1,309 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 262.3 1000 USD | 1.96 1000 USD | 260.35 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 181.69 1000 USD | 0.285 1000 USD | 181.41 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Ecuador or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 24.66 1000 USD against 21.42 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Ecuador and Maldives?
- 3.24 1000 USD, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Maldives?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Maldives rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Ecuador ranks 120th and Maldives ranks 118th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf