Ecuador vs Mexico: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Ecuador
- Mexico
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 21.42 1000 USD against 16.98 1000 USD in Mexico, a difference of 4.44 1000 USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mexico ahead.
Ecuador ranks 120th and Mexico ranks 122nd of 173 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,313 1000 USD | 487.85 1000 USD | 824.67 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 250.54 1000 USD | 127.57 1000 USD | 122.97 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 409.48 1000 USD | 107.17 1000 USD | 302.31 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Ecuador or Mexico?
- Ecuador, at 21.42 1000 USD against 16.98 1000 USD in Mexico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Ecuador and Mexico?
- 4.44 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mexico?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Mexico rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Ecuador ranks 120th and Mexico ranks 122nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf