Eswatini vs Madagascar: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Madagascar
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.17 1000 USD against 0.12 1000 USD in Madagascar, a difference of 0.05 1000 USD.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Madagascar's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 161st and Madagascar ranks 164th of 173 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 204.04 1000 USD | 30.58 1000 USD | 173.46 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 132.42 1000 USD | 14.37 1000 USD | 118.05 1000 USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Eswatini or Madagascar?
- Eswatini, at 0.17 1000 USD against 0.12 1000 USD in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Eswatini and Madagascar?
- 0.05 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Madagascar?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Madagascar rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 161st and Madagascar ranks 164th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf