Eswatini vs Montenegro: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Montenegro
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.17 1000 USD against 0.17 1000 USD in Montenegro, a difference of 0 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 161st and Montenegro ranks 161st of 173 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 141.35 1000 USD | 11.23 1000 USD | 130.12 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 89.74 1000 USD | 22.02 1000 USD | 67.72 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.17 1000 USD | 0.17 1000 USD | 0 1000 USD | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Eswatini or Montenegro?
- Eswatini, at 0.17 1000 USD against 0.17 1000 USD in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Eswatini and Montenegro?
- 0 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Montenegro rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 161st and Montenegro ranks 161st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf